IMU scam you may request a refund?
2.6.13
Edit
Lately, the former finance minister Giulio Tremonti is campaigning Anti IMU, defining such a tax Incosituzionale.
After the negative opinion from the European Union concerning the tax on real property, that is, the IMU, who called it unconstitutional because it violates Articles 3, 47 and 53 of the Constitution also former Minister Giulio Tremonti is associated with this conclusion and explains the reasons for this unconstitutional on its website.
To request a rimbroso have to move in the following way:
Invare a Recommended A / R at the municipality for explaining the reason for which you request reimbursement of amounts paid to do what you need to fill out a form indicating a concise list of all the profiles of unconstitutionality on which the IMU Save Italian version dl (dl 201/2011). The main crack in the tax structure is constituted by the revaluation of the tax base made "without any connection to the real and underlying economic values." Criteria of flexibility could not be omitted, as has been done, are required for a permanent property tax which the IMU is also necessary to take into account that instead of property values can fall as well as rise and fall given the period of economic recession. The consequence of this rigidity is that those who have an adequate income can afford to pay, who does not have it you will see practically forced to sell.
After the expiry of 90 days from the presentation of the municipalities, is the use of the Tax Commission, which may occur even if the municipality has not responded. What one needs to apply to the Commission is unconstitutional IMU and ask the forgiveness of the case to the Constitutional Court.
We would like to clarify that we are not experts, but we felt it appropriate to inform our visitors of this "opportunity", therefore we invite you to ask for clarification uteriori to whom it may concern.
Without a doubt we will keep you informed on the evolving situation.
After the negative opinion from the European Union concerning the tax on real property, that is, the IMU, who called it unconstitutional because it violates Articles 3, 47 and 53 of the Constitution also former Minister Giulio Tremonti is associated with this conclusion and explains the reasons for this unconstitutional on its website.
To request a rimbroso have to move in the following way:
Invare a Recommended A / R at the municipality for explaining the reason for which you request reimbursement of amounts paid to do what you need to fill out a form indicating a concise list of all the profiles of unconstitutionality on which the IMU Save Italian version dl (dl 201/2011). The main crack in the tax structure is constituted by the revaluation of the tax base made "without any connection to the real and underlying economic values." Criteria of flexibility could not be omitted, as has been done, are required for a permanent property tax which the IMU is also necessary to take into account that instead of property values can fall as well as rise and fall given the period of economic recession. The consequence of this rigidity is that those who have an adequate income can afford to pay, who does not have it you will see practically forced to sell.
After the expiry of 90 days from the presentation of the municipalities, is the use of the Tax Commission, which may occur even if the municipality has not responded. What one needs to apply to the Commission is unconstitutional IMU and ask the forgiveness of the case to the Constitutional Court.
We would like to clarify that we are not experts, but we felt it appropriate to inform our visitors of this "opportunity", therefore we invite you to ask for clarification uteriori to whom it may concern.
Without a doubt we will keep you informed on the evolving situation.